Stephenson, D., Bevins, R.E., Millward, D., Highton, A.J., Parsons, I., Stone, P. & Wadsworth, W.J. 1999. Caledonian Igneous Rocks of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 17, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 471 9. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Loch Borralan Intrusion
I. Parsons
Introduction
The Loch Borralan intrusion, in the SW corner of the Assynt region
The unusual character of the rocks was recognized in the 19th century and the intrusion has held an important place in the international development of igneous petrology. The first specific account of the intrusion was by Horne and Teall (1892) who described the pyroxene-melanite nepheline-pseudoleucite-syenite, which they called 'borolanite'. (There have been several spellings; the current spelling for the Loch is 'Borralan' but 'Borolan' has precedence for the rock name). Additional rocks were described by Teall (1900). The intrusion was mapped, and an account given, by Peach et al. (1907), and S. J. Shand carried out pioneering detailed petrographical and analytical work in the following years (1906, 1909, 1910 and 1939). Rock names introduced by these early workers, 'borolanite', 'ledmorite', 'cromaltite' and 'assyntite'
Shand suggested that the Borralan rocks owed their silica-deficient character to disilication reactions between a magma of broadly granitic composition and the Cambro-Ordovician dolomitic limestones that form much of the envelope
Shand (1910) also postulated that the intrusion has the form of a gradationally stratified lac-colith, a model accepted by Bowen (1928) who reproduced Shand's section through the supposed laccolith, and argued that the pseudoleucite-bearing rocks at the base of the laccolith formed as a result of crystal settling under the influence of gravity leaving a silica-oversaturated liquid which crystallized to produce quartz-syenites. He justified this interpretation on the basis of new insights gained from his experimental petrological studies. Tilley (1957) rejected Bowen's hypothesis on the grounds that leucite would not crystallize at likely high water-vapour pressures. He provided some new analyses of 'ledmorites' from Loch Borralan, and compared them with dykes in the Foreland, from Camas Eilean Ghlais, Coigach and from Achmelvich, far from dolomitic limestones of the Durness Group, complementing analyses provided by Sabine (1952, 1953). This connection, between distinctive alkaline dyke rocks in the Foreland, and the Loch Borralan pluton in the thrust zone, is of considerable regional structural and temporal significance.
Subsequent interpretations of the internal structure of the intrusion have questioned the gradational character of the boundaries. The complex has a broadly concentric form
The structural relationships of the Loch Borralan intrusion are of considerable geochronological importance (Halliday et al, 1987), as summarized in
There is considerable discussion in the literature concerning the structural relationships between the Loch Borralan intrusion and the Ben More Thrust (sometimes called the Assynt Thrust in this part of Assynt, see Johnson and Parsons, 1979) and the Sole Thrust which crops out slightly to the west of the intrusion and must dip beneath it. Several structurally critical areas of the intrusion are described below in a separate section. The relationship of the igneous rocks to the thrust movements is an important issue, because several workers (Bailey and McCallien, 1934 and Woolley 1970) have suggested that early members of the intrusive complex were emplaced before or during movements on the Ben More Thrust, and hence the complex can provide a very exact date for this episode of movement in the Moine thrust zone. However, more recent work (Parsons and McKirdy, 1983) has shown that the ultramafic and nepheline-syenite members were emplaced after the movements on the Ben More thrust plane, and new exposures in the marble quarry at Ledbeg show 'borolanite' cutting quartzites which have moved on the Ben More thrust plane. The evidence now seems to suggest that emplacement of all the units of the Loch Borralan complex occurred after the movements on the Ben More Thrust had ceased. The Loch Ailsh mass was undoubtedly emplaced in the rocks of the Ben More Nappe before the movements on the thrust plane, so that the 439 ± 4 and 430 ± 4 Ma ages on the two intrusions provide an important bracket on the time of the main movements on the Ben More Thrust. A K: Ar age of 394 ± 8 Ma obtained on a mica from Loch Borralan by Brown et al. (1968; recalculated with more recent decay constants by van Breemen et al., 1979a) has been interpreted to mean that some 30 Ma elapsed before the temperature in the pile of nappes fell below an Ar blocking temperature of c. 300°C (van Breemen et al., 1979a).
The relationship of the Loch Borralan complex to the Sole Thrust cannot be established directly as the two are not seen in contact. The intrusion does not become more deformed as it approaches the Sole Thrust, which crops out about 1 km to the west, in contrast with its behaviour as the Moine Thrust is approached. The alignment of nepheline-syenite ('ledmorite') dykes in the Foreland (Sabine, 1952, 1953) with the Loch Borralan nepheline-syenites suggests that little or no horizontal displacement of the mass has occurred since emplacement. Halliday et al. (1987) accepted the implication that the Loch Borralan mass was emplaced after the main movements on the Sole Thrust. However, from structural mapping, Coward (1985) concluded that the Loch Borralan intrusion has been moved at least 30 km on the Sole Thrust since emplacement. These apparent contradictions between structural interpretations in Assynt and the chronology of igneous events remain unresolved.
The Borralan site also provides examples of contact metamorphism and metasomatism of which the most spectacular examples are those seen in the marble quarry NE of Ledbeg
Description
The intrusion covers an area of around 26 km2, and comprises several low hills culminating in Cnoc-na-Sroine at 398 m, surrounded by an area of low, largely peat-covered ground in which most of the more unusual rock types crop out
The description below follows Woolley's (1970) division of the complex into two suites, with an intrusive junction between them. The early suite comprises pyroxenites, nepheline-syenites and pseudoleucite-syenites, while the later suite is feldspathic syenites ('perthosites') and quartz-syenites. The two suites are not now believed to be related by in-situ fractionation processes. The early suite appears to have a sheet-like (laccolithic) form, while the, later suite appears to have the form of a plug punching through the earlier rocks. The variety of rocks in the early suite is extremely large, exposure is very poor, and few exposures reveal contact relationships. The most useful descriptions of field relationships are those of Woolley (1970, 1973), extended by the drilling work mentioned above and by the excavations reported by Parsons and McKirdy (1983) and Young et al. (1994).
Early suite
Ultramafic rocks
Biotite-magnetite pyroxenites, with and without melanite (called 'cromalite' by Shand, 1910), and hornblendites crop out only in the low ground in the SW of the intrusion. Despite their extent demonstrated by geophysical means there are only poor exposures. A map of the western corner of the Loch Borralan complex, showing all the exposures and the extent of the pyroxenites deduced from magnetic and gravity anomalies and proved by drilling (Matthews and Woolley, 1977; Notholt et al., 1985; Shaw et al., 1992), shown in
The origin of the pyroxenites is controversial. Matthews and Woolley (1977) favoured the Bowen (1928) hypothesis that the pyroxenites are cumulate rocks from the base of the sheet forming the 'early suite', and postulated that they have been brought to their present attitude by faulting or by squeezing of a partly consolidated layered sequence, but the writer (in Johnson and Parsons, 1979) suggested that they are a metasomatic assemblage at the junction between the syenites and dolomitic limestones. The incorrectness of the latter view was demonstrated by the Nature Conservancy Council excavations near Bad na h-Achlaise reported by Parsons and McKirdy (1983) which clearly show the intrusive character of the pyroxenites into quartzites of the Cam Loch Klippe carried over the Durness Group rocks by the Ben More Thrust
The excavations (1–3 on
The commercial interest in the pyroxenites was initially because of their high magnetite content but the more recent drilling work was to evaluate the phosphate potential of the apatite-bearing pyroxenite. While not currently economic, the body constitutes the most significant phosphate resource yet found in the United Kingdom (Notholt et al., 1985).
Nepheline-syenites
In addition to the exposures of syenite at Bad na h-Achlaise (previous section) members of the less mafic part of the early suite crop out extensively in the Ledmore River at Ledmore (
In their drillcore material, Notholt and Highley (1981) recognized two generations of syenites intrusive into the pyroxenites: (1) leucocratic, pink syenite veins usually a few centimetres in thickness; (2) two types of more mafic syenite: (a) melanite garnet-bearing, sometimes with as much as 50% garnet; (b) pyroxene syenites, sometimes garnetiferous, showing both intrusive and gradational relationships to the pyroxenites. All of these types can be seen in the very poor exposures near Bad na h-Achlaise although their spatial relationships cannot be established. A pile of large boulders extracted during the building of a forestry road can be inspected in a shallow quarry at the track side just to the north of Bad na h-Achlaise. These include several varieties of nepheline-syenite showing cross-cutting relationships, with some intimate vein networks. There are some pyroxenite xenoliths in syenite, a relationship found in boreholes by Notholt and Highley (1981). They provide good evidence of the fractionation of several magma-types before emplacement. These exposures (and excavations) of plutonic nepheline-syenites are unique in the British Isles.
Pseudoleucite-syenite and associated rocks This suite, which includes the intrusion's best known rock type borolanite', (Horne and Teall, 1892), mainly crops out in the eastern part of the complex, and is particularly well exposed around the Allt a' Mhuillin
Other silica-undersaturated rocks in the eastern part of the Borralan complex form an extremely diverse suite. They are exposed sporadically in the ground east of Allt a' Mhuillin, for which Woolley (1973) gives an accurate map defining three main types arranged in eastward-dipping sheets
The lowest exposures in the Allt a' Mhuillin gorge are of highly deformed borolanite', but upstream there are layers of pyroxene-rich 'shonkinite', chemically similar to 'ledmorite' (Woolley, 1973). A fine-grained alkali feldspar-biotite-albite rock called 'vullinite' by Shand (1910) occurs above the gorge. Shand considered it to be a metamorphosed sediment but Macgregor and Phemister (1937) thought it was a metamorphosed earlier igneous rock. Woolley (1973) considered that the lower and pseudoleucite suites had a generally sheet-like form, and that the pseudoleucite-bearing rocks were emplaced after the lower suite. Within the 'borolanites' a roughly contact-parallel boundary
Rocks of 'borolanite' type occur in the thrust-defined body known as the Loyne mass, at the NW extremity of the intrusion
Carbonatite
The igneous carbonate rock, carbonatite, was discovered as blocks of orange-brown carbonate rock on the beach at Loch Urigill (at
Four varieties of carbonatite have been found, three in situ. These are porphyritic sövite, phlogopite sövite, and sövite breccia. The fourth variety, a foliated silicocarbonatite, has been found only as a 30 cm block in the drift. Considerable internal heterogeneity is a common feature of carbonatites, which often involve several generations of brecciation and incorporation into later phases of injection. The most striking rock is the phlogopite sövite, which owes its orange colour to myriads of small phlogopite plates included in a matrix of large calcite crystals. The rock also contains rosettes of apatite. The porphyritic sövite is white in colour, and is made of coarse calcite crystals. On one face of the exposure it is layered, with 2 cm-thick bands of the relatively rare mineral chondrodite (a hydrated magnesium silicate) separated by 25 cm-thick layers of normal sövite. The sövite breccia is a matrix-supported breccia of brown carbonatite fragments in a coarsely crystalline, brown sövite matrix resembling the phlogopite sövite.
Late suite
The silica-saturated and oversaturated alkali feldspar-syenites of the late suite are relatively well exposed on the southern slopes of Cnoc-na-Sroine. The rocks are less exotic and controversial than those of the earlier suite, and are similar to the 'perthosites' and melanite syenites in the Loch Ailsh intrusion. The top of Cnoc-na-Sroine is formed of quartz-syenites ('nordmarkites') which, with around 12 vol.% quartz, are more quartzose than the quartz-syenites at Loch Ailsh and a little richer in potassium relative to sodium (Parsons, 1972). Shand (1910) considered that the quartz-syenites grade downwards continuously into quartz-free syenites, with or without melanite, and eventually into the melanite syenites ('ledmorites') in the Ledmore River.
Woolley (1970) divided the syenites into a downward succession of quartz-syenites, 'perthosites' (with or without melanite) and 'grey perthosites'. The former two variants form the bulk of Cnoc-na-Sroine, and their relationships are best seen in the Allt a' Bhrisdidh
Junctions between early and late suites
Exposures illustrating the relationships of early and late suites are of importance because of the bearing they have on the genesis of the rocks of the complex as a whole, and because of the possibility that the two suites were emplaced respectively before and after the main movements on the Ben More thrust plane (as suggested by Woolley, 1970, but disputed by Elliott and Johnson, 1980).
Shand (1910) believed that all boundaries in the complex are gradational, but Woolley (1970) agreed with Macgregor and Phemister (1937) that the later suite is intrusive into the earlier one, with sharp boundaries. Critical relationships are seen only at two localities. The most important junction (Woolley, 1970) is in the lower part of the Allt a' Bhrisdidh
A second critical junction (Woolley, 1970) is in poorly exposed ground about 0.5 km NE of the deep section of the Allt a' Mhuilinn gorge
Localities important for structural reasons
Three localities have had particular importance for structural and geochronological reasons. They provide the best evidence for the temporal relationship between the igneous activity and the thrusting, and the measured ages of rocks in the Loch Borralan and Loch Ailsh intrusions provide the best estimate of the timing of movements in the Moine thrust belt in general
In Bad na h-Achlaise
Large-scale evidence that the intrusion punches through the Ben More thrust plane can be obtained by consideration of the relationships between geology and topography at the west end of Cnoc-na-Sroine. To the east of Ledbeg (
External contacts
Contacts of the intrusion against country rocks are very badly exposed. On the A837 near Ledbeg
An important group of exposures occur to the north of Loyne (around
Contacts between igneous rocks and the envelope are nowhere exposed along the SW and E edges of the intrusion. Only the drilling work (Matthews and Woolley, 1977; Notholt et al., 1985; Shaw et al., 1992) has revealed the extensive zone of metamorphic calc-silicate rocks that forms the contact of the igneous pyroxenite bodies beneath the peat on Mointeach na Totaig. At the NW end of the mixed pyroxenite–nepheline-syenite zone there are a few contacts of syenite with quartzite, of which the excavated example from Bad na h-Achlaise is the most instructive. Fenitization of quartzite exposures from near here has been described by Woolley et al. (1972), Rock (1977) who described fenitization of a block in drift, and Martin et al. (1978).
Interpretation
The poor exposure of the Loch Borralan intrusion, its exceptional petrological diversity, and its complex tectonic setting, make interpretation of field and petrogenetic relationships extremely difficult. The excavations and drilling that have taken place since the exposure mapping of Shand (1910) and Woolley (1970) have invariably led to major re-assessments, and the recent report of carbonatite (Young et al., 1994) shows that even exposural evidence has not yet been fully exploited. The reader should have an open mind when assessing the following brief interpretation.
The original interpretation of the whole intrusion as a continuously stratified laccolith, with the various rock types related by crystal settling, has not stood the test of time. The leucocratic, silica-saturated and oversaturated members have an intrusive relationship to the earlier, generally more mafic, undersaturated suite, which may be demonstrated in Allt a' Bhrisdidh and near Allt a' Mhuillin. Both suites show clear internal evidence of the emplacement of pulses of magma of different composition, presumably fractionated before emplacement. Nepheline-syenites, melanite syenites and pyroxene syenites around the critical exposures at Bad na h-Achlaise were certainly emplaced in several phases. The mafic melanite syenites and ledmorites' are part of this suite, and all types show complex cross-cutting relationships. The more leucocratic syenites cut the pyroxene syenites and both types cut the pyroxenites and the skarn rocks. The western edge of the intrusion appears to be a complex interleaving of all these rock types but even the considerable drilling programme does not reveal the overall structure.
Woolley's (1973) mapping of the main area of pseudoleucite-bearing rocks in the SE part of the intrusion suggests that the rocks there are stratified and possibly fractionated in situ. The structural relationship between the main pseudo-leucite suite and the nepheline-syenites that are now known (through drilling only) to occupy a large part of the SW margin of the intrusion is not clear, although there are several localities in the western part of the intrusion (Loyne, Ledbeg quarry and the hidden contacts on Mointeach na Totaig) where 'borolanites' occur, interestingly always in close association with limestones. Evidence that the early pseudoleucite-bearing suite around Allt a' Mhuillin was emplaced early, before the ledmorites' and nepheline-syenites, as suggested by Woolley (1970), hinges on the interpretation placed on the flattening of the pseudoleucites. As the pyroxenite and nepheline-syenite members of the early suite are clearly intrusive into rocks of the Ben More Nappe at Bad na h-Achlaise, but are undeformed (Parsons and McKirdy, 1983), the pseudoleucite-bearing assemblage must be earlier. But if the fabric in the pseudoleucite-bearing rocks at Aultivullin is related to their mode of emplacement, their relative emplacement age is equivocal. There is an urgent need to investigate the structural relationship between these exotic rocks and the remainder of the intrusion, particularly the newly exposed 'borolanites' at Ledbeg.
The large, steeply dipping mass of biotite-magnetite pyroxenite under the peat of Mòinteach na Totaig is earlier than at least three generations of the nepheline-syenites, which occur, largely unseen, to the NE. The pyroxenites are known by drilling to be interleaved with skarn rocks, but were undoubtedly magmatic as is demonstrated by their intrusive relationships at Bad na h-Achlaise, where the pyroxenites are intrusive into quartzites that were moved previously into position on the Ben More Thrust. The high temperatures implied by their bulk mineralogy remain problematical. The cumulate origin favoured by Matthews and Woolley (1977) requires faulting or emplacement as a crystal mush to explain both their near-vertical form and structural level. Their evidence for a cumulate origin is the presence, in borehole material, of alternating, sharply defined pyroxene- and hornblende-rich layers, a few centimetres thick, in which the hornblende shows a preferred orientation. The 'cumulate' textures are not unequivocally due to crystal settling, although it is a possible interpretation, and it is not clear how the layering would survive the proposed squeezing of a crystal mush. Furthermore, the rocks are similar (apart from the presence of garnet) to the pyroxenites in the nearby Loch Ailsh complex which have a dyke-like form between syenite and dolomitic limestone. Although the pyroxenites are intrusive rocks, their intimate association with a major calc-silicate and magnesium-silicate skarn body at the margin of the silicate rocks is at least suggestive of an origin involving reactions between silicate magma and the dolomitic limestones. Young et al. (1994) provided Rare Earth Element (REE) plots of a range of rocks from Loch Borralan. The Bad na h-Achlaise pyroxenites and a diopside-rich skarn rock from a borehole nearby have very similar patterns, as do borolanites' and 'ledmorites'. In contrast, the leucocratic nepheline-syenites and the carbonatite show much greater enrichment in the light REE. Although the alkaline magmas undoubtedly originated in the Earth's mantle, the visitor to the Loch Borralan and Loch Ailsh intrusions should be open-minded about the origin of the pyroxenites. Perhaps, to this extent, Shand's ideas live on.
The affiliation of the recently discovered carbonatite to the Loch Borralan intrusion is demonstrated by the syenite and pyroxenite xenoliths it contains, and its true character as a carbonatite by its trace and rare-earth element contents and patterns, and its carbon and oxygen isotopes (Young et al., 1994). The mineralogy and internal heterogeneity are characteristic of carbonatites. While it is perhaps surprising that these rocks went unnoticed until 1988, the association of carbonatite with nepheline-syenite magmatism is seen worldwide and the occurrence itself is unsurprising. Diopsidic pyroxenites are also commonly associated with carbonatites. The shape of the Loch Urigill carbonatite is unknown but it cannot be more than approximately 100 m in diameter.
The late suite of melanite alkali feldspar-syenites and quartz-syenites is internally much simpler than the early suite. Cnoc-na-Sroine shows an upward progression from 'perthosites', often with melanite, to quartz-syenites at the top, complicated only by the presence of some quartz-syenite sheets at lower levels. The contact relationships with the early suite give little information on the overall shape but it is perhaps a stock-like body at least 275 m thick (Woolley, 1970). These rocks are generally similar to the alkali feldspar-syenites at Loch Ailsh, but are chemically subtly different (Parsons, 1972) and were emplaced significantly later, after the movements on the Ben More Thrust (Halliday et al., 1987), so that their current proximity may hide an initial separation of perhaps several tens of km. The overall shape of the early suite seems to be sheet-like (see Woolley, 1980) as is its internal structure in the eastern part of the complex. Exposed contacts with country rocks are extremely rare, but the quartzite–pyroxenite contact at Bad na h-Achlaise and the dolomitic limestone–'borolanite' contacts in the Ledmore marble quarry are particularly important. Huge volumes of skarn rocks occur beneath Mòinteach na Totaig but are unexposed.
Conclusions
The Loch Borralan intrusion is the only plutonic igneous complex composed of silica-undersaturated rocks in the British Isles, and it contains several rock types that are extremely rare on a worldwide scale. Some of its members are among the most potassium-rich rocks on Earth. Very recently, a small body of igneous carbonate rock (carbonatite), with syenite xenoliths, has been discovered just outside the main intrusion. This too is a unique occurrence of this rock type in the British Isles. Exposure around Loch Borralan is notoriously bad but the intrusion has an important historical position in the development of igneous petrology through its contribution to the concept of silica saturation. It also has historical prominence because of the idea that reactions between limestone and silicate magma (desilication) were essential to the formation of feldspathoid-bearing rocks (the 'Daly–Shand hypothesis'), and the suggestion that the intrusion was a single, internally stratified, gravitationally differentiated laccolith. Neither hypothesis has stood the test of time; the modern view of such magmatism is that it has its origins in the Earth's mantle, but the detailed geotectonic setting of the Borralan mass and its associated rocks is still a matter of debate.
The current structural view is that the intrusion was emplaced in two major episodes. An early suite, consisting of ultramafic and feldspathoid-bearing rocks involving several (at least five, and perhaps several more) pulses of already differentiated magmas, is extremely complex. It includes the celebrated pseudoleucite-bearing 'borolanites', has a sheet-like, laccolithic form and may have partly differentiated in situ. The ultramafic rocks (biotite-magnetite pyroxenites) contain Britain's largest reserves of phosphate (as apatite) and form a steep-sided, extended lenticular dyke-like body, cut by several generations of feldspathoidal syenite, and interleaved with diopside-, phlogopite- and forsterite-rich rocks produced by reactions with Durness Group dolomitic limestones. A new quarry, at Ledmore, provides outstanding exposures illustrating reactions between 'borolanites' and carbonate rocks.
The later suite is composed of alkali feldspar-syenites ('perthosites') and quartz-syenites. It appears to punch through the early suite and may have a stock-like form. It becomes more quartz-rich upwards but sheets of quartz-syenite cut 'perthosite' lower in the mass. These rocks are mineralogically quite similar to, although chemically distinct from, the syenites in the neighbouring Loch Ailsh intrusion.
The intrusion provides an important time-marker for movements in the Moine thrust zone. Most (and perhaps all) of the early suite were emplaced after the main movements on the Ben More thrust plane. Thus its U-Pb age of 430 ± 4 Ma provides a minimum age for these movements, while the just-significantly-different age of 439 ± 4 Ma for the neighbouring Loch Ailsh complex provides a maximum. It is possible that a flattening fabric affecting the 'borolanites' was produced during movements on the Ben More Thrust. This interpretation is controversial, but if correct it implies that the 'borolanites' result from the earliest phase of emplacement, and that the movements on the Ben More Thrust were very close to 430 Ma. Evidence that the Loch Borralan complex post-dates large-scale movements on the Sole Thrust comes from its alignment with nepheline-syenite dykes in the Foreland, which also place the source of this extreme magmatism firmly in the mantle underlying the Lewisian gneisses.