Huddart, D. & Glasser, N.F. 2007. Quaternary of Northern England. Geological Conservation Review Series No. 25, JNCC, Peterborough, ISBN 1 86107 490 5. The original source material for these web pages has been made available by the JNCC under the Open Government Licence 3.0. Full details in the JNCC Open Data Policy
Aqualate Mere
D. Huddart
Introduction
This site in Staffordshire, consists of an esker system formed during Late Devensian deglaciation. It is an important location because it demonstrates the close association between eskers and fan deposits and was used to develop an early model for esker sedimentation by the [British] Geological Survey (Dixon, 1922, 1926; Whitehead et al., 1927, 1928). The esker, and related fan, kettleholes and ice-contact slopes, provides evidence for landform development associated with active ice-sheet marginal wastage and this region forms one of the most instructive locations in the country for demonstrating this type of esker model. There has been a recent revival of interest in the processes of esker sedimentation (e.g. Brennand, 1994; Huddart and Bennett, 1997; Thomas and Montague, 1997) and, in particular, the model whereby active ice retreat allows subglacial, ice-walled or supraglacial fluviatile sedimentation into pro-glacial lakes to produce beaded eskers or fans (e.g. Gorell and Shaw, 1991; Warren and Ashley, 1994; Thomas et al., in press).
Description
The Aqualate Mere esker is located on the north side of Aqualate Mere and comprises a series of elongate hills, orientated east–west, in a linear strip some 1.6 km long and 300 m wide at its maximum
Interpretation
The interpretation of the Aqualate Mere deposits has to be viewed in the context of the regional deglaciation in this part of Staffordshire (Whitehead et al., 1927, 1928; Worsley, 1967b, 1970, 1975). The area is located between the Ellesmere–Whitchurch–Bar Hill moraine (Boulton and Worsley, 1965; Yates and Moseley, 1967) and the Devensian drift limit to the south (Worsley, 1970). In this area the ice sheet created few distinct landforms, although these include the often cited Newport–Wolverhampton esker chain, of which Aqualate Mere forms a part. This esker was first identified by Dixon (1922) during the [British] Geological Survey's primary mapping, but no map was published showing the exact esker distribution. Occasional areas of sand and gravel, called 'kames' by Dixon, were described as being bounded by steep northern slopes and were interpreted as marginal ice-contact slopes. By projecting the trends of these marginal features Dixon was able to postulate ice-stand positions, which generally were concordant with an ENE–WSW alignment. Whitehead et al. (1927) suggested that many of the landforms must have been deposited extra-glacially at an ice-front, or in a glacial lake and that the most characteristic masses can be defined as eskers, deltas and fans, although there also are many undefined glaciofluvial deposits that might be categorized as kames and did not have a well-defined relationship with the ice sheet. The classification of these ice-margin al forms based on Whitehead et al. (1928) is given in
Gregory (1921) suggested that eskers are 'the deltaic deposits of glacial rivers and their ridged form is due to their continuous deposition at successive positions by the slow recession of the river mouth during the retreat of the ice sheet.' Often it is suggested that these types of eskers, and those formed subglacially, indicate the waning phase of a glacial period by the very fact that they are preserved at all. The ice marginal area was most likely stationary and retreated by frontal melting. Esker deltas are formed in a pro-glacial lake fed from a feeding esker, whereas esker fans are fed from an esker and deposited subaerially as a frontal fan. Outwash deltas and outwash fans on the other hand do not have feeding eskers but show by their morphology that they have been deposited in association with a stationary ice front by an emerging sub-glacial river.
The pro-glacial lake in which some of these deposits were laid down was called 'Lake Newport' by Whitehead et al. (1927) and it was considered that it occupied the gap between the retreating ice front and the higher ground that separates the North Shropshire plain from the Trent basin to the east and the Lower Severn basin to the south-west
No sedimentological evidence is available in the area to prove the environment of deposition, although at Weaver's Hill
Conclusions
The Aqualate Mere landforms constitute an important part of the interpretation of ice-frontal deposition into pro-glacial lakes as the Irish Sea ice sheet actively retreated to the northwest. There is excellent morphological evidence for an esker chain, ice-contact slopes and probably subaqueous fans, rather than deltas, which built up pro-glacially from a subglacial river. Unfortunately sediment exposure is not available, but at nearby Weaver's Hill the sediments that are exposed are not inconsistent with this model of ice-frontal deposition into a pro-glacial lake. The regional picture is consistent with this local interpretation and it is considered that Dixon's original model for ice retreat and its association with pro-glacial lakes is likely to be correct. However, without detailed sedimentological evidence to add to the landform interpretation the model must remain unproven.